How Google's SSL Impacts Branded vs. Non-branded Search

Subscribe by Email

Your email:


Brand & Capture

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

How Google's SSL Impacts Branded vs. Non-branded Search

 
googles ssl impact

The past week, I’ve been working a report analyzing keywords, traffic and conversions, and while researching the topic, I came across a good, straightforward piece by Will Uppington at bloomreach.  He describes the differences between navigational and non-navigational traffic, or branded and non-branded. 

Optimizing for Branded vs. Non-branded Keywords

These terms refer to visitors who come to your site using a keyword that includes your brand name or the name of one of your products, versus visitors who use non-branded keywords. Non-branded keywords might include a product category or a problem the visitor is trying to solve.

Visitors using branded keywords are awesome, because they are typically BOFU (bottom of the funnel) leads, which means they know you, they came to you specifically and are probably ready to buy. Visitors using non-branded keywords are more likely to be TOFU leads, or top of the funnel. They have an interest or need in an area that applies to you or your products, and are doing some Internet research to learn more.

While visitors who search on branded keywords are more likely to convert, when assembling your SEO or PPC campaign strategy, do you want to focus all of your efforts on this group, just for the higher conversion rate? This might not be the best strategy. A sales funnel of only BOFU leads is not sustainable, and isn’t really a funnel at all. We need to have a constant flow of leads at all stages of the sales lifecycle in order to support growth. A comprehensive SEO/PPC campaign will focus on both branded and non-branded keywords, but consider what the right ratio might be when allocating resources. Here are a few suggestions:

  • Optimize your PPC campaign for top of the funnel and middle of the funnel using non-branded keywords. TOFU and MOFU leads are most likely to search on non-branded keywords, and paid search is an effective way to reach new prospects.
  • Focus on long-tail SEO with keyword phrases containing three or more words. These keywords attract prospects looking for specific information and have a higher conversion rate.
  • Map your lead nurturing campaign to leads at each stage of the sales lifecycle. Create findable content that pulls new visitors into the top of the funnel, nurtures them into the middle of the funnel, and prepares them for the bottom of the funnel.

Analyzing Keywords in the Era of Encrypted Search

Of course, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to even analyze keywords – branded or not – thanks to the changes Google made to search about a year ago. To briefly rehash the story for those unaware or those who conveniently forgot, Google made SSL encryption the default on Google searches for all Google users signed into a Google account. This encryption prevents keyword data from being passed on to the destination website owner, instead appearing as “not provided.” We can still see the number of visits and leads that came from these sources in the aggregate, but the actual keywords are hidden.

Google initially estimated that this change would only impact 10 percent of search data being passed on to marketers. A year later, companies are reporting much higher numbers, including Kuno and many of our clients, where we are seeing anywhere between 15 and 50 percent.

There are several factors likely contributing to this increase:

  • SSL Search was gradually rolled out to Google users, so the impact didn’t happen overnight.
  • Google+ has continued to grow, which has possibly increased the number of logged-in Google users.
  • Firefox 14, launched in July 2012, defaults to Google SSL Search.
  • Safari on iOS6, just launched in September, also defaults to Google SSL Search. This one is extra-problematic because this traffic is appearing as “direct” instead of “organic.” Google is supposedly working on a fix for this
  • Internet users are more aware of security issues, and we could be seeing more savvy folks opting-in to SSL on their own.

Search experts think this trend is going to continue, which begs the question, "What do we do?" Should we be redirecting our efforts and resources elsewhere? Many argue that this further emphasizes the need for good, relevant and shareable content, but doesn’t that content need to be optimized? I’d love to hear what my fellow inbound marketers think. Leave a comment below!

photo credit: shareski

6a327976-68f6-44fc-ab13-7a73a12ec8bd

 


Comments

Obviously, the Google SSL has angered and confused many of us, especially those of us who have aligned ourselves with natural SEO all along. But I have always been a firm believer in providing relevant, informative content as the ultimate SEO strategy. The SSL issue does make optimization more difficult,so what do we do? 
 
I wish I had the answer. I'd sell the formula to every one else! ;-)  
 
Honestly, it's been a powerful reminder that Google is here to make money, not help us increase our natural page ranking. Personally, I've been relying on indicators from the long tail and PPC and seen impressive gains in a few competitive client markets YOY. The big blank from Google is still frustrating, but it is what it is. The nature of SEO is evolution, so that's what we do. We roll with it. 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:42 AM by Jeremy
Thanks for your comment, Jeremy. Google certainly keeps us on our toes, which isn't an entirely bad thing, right?
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:30 AM by Meghan Sullivan
Somebody's got to do it. Complacency kills.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:39 AM by Jeremy
Great that Meghan wrote on this. And as Inbound Marketers, a degree of challenge seeped in total ambiguity is welcome. And SSL keywords do provide that challenge.  
 
I am sharing our recent experience with two clients as we helped them set up their SEO keyword strategy. It is pointed out that we used "Google Analytics" to build the initial list of keywords.  
 
A good way to deal with SSL keywords is to minimize their incidence. One way to do so, is to first identify known traffic sources and block them. This endeavor helped us bring the SSL contribution down from 18% to 11% on a daily traffic basis. Luckily, there weren't many firefox and safari users.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:12 AM by Rajagopalan C
That's interesting. Could you explain your approach a bit further. What were you blocking?
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:24 AM by Jeremy
Thanks for your comment! It's interesting to hear how other marketers are dealing with this and the work-arounds they discover. Like Jeremy, I'd also like to hear more about your approach.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:11 PM by Meghan Sullivan
Comments have been closed for this article.