Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Brand & Capture

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Stop Obsessing Over Rank - It is the WRONG SEO Metric!

 

Over the last few months, we here at Kuno have observed, commented on, written about and generally participated in the fiery debate surrounding today’s state of SEO. The debate is mostly about terminology, semantics and nomenclature. However, most stakeholders in the debate still assume that where a website ranks is paramount to the success of an SEOs work at-large. Last year, Google ushered in a slew of changes to its algorithm, which has fundamentally changed SEO forever.

Corroborating evidence for the argument presented below:

The Debate

These changes mean that in order for SEOs to get their clients to rank well, they need to create and publish lots of content, deploy social media marketing and perform PR (what we call inbound marketing) in addition to their traditional SEO work. Because of this, many feel the term SEO no longer suffices for describing what is required to rank well. Others want to use the term SEO as an umbrella term encompassing content marketing, social media marketing and certain PR functions.

SEO vs Content Marketing

The Experts Weigh-in

Andy Betts does a really good job of describing these changes in the SEO landscape, what the new landscape looks like and what caused it in the Future of SEO: Change, Convergence, Collaboration. Miranda Miller in Nomenclature: The Industry Case For and Against SEO interviewed many SEO industry experts to gauge their opinion on the debate. Some want to keep SEO as a catch-all phrase while others use terms like inbound marketing, internet marketing optimization or earned media.

The 800-pound SEO gorilla that’s being ignored  

While many participating in the debate have good solid arguments, they all seem to be ignoring the new reality – where a website ranks no longer matters. SEO success has generally been measured by how high a website ranks for a particular set of keyword phrases. The way it should be measured is by how many keyword phrases drive traffic regardless of where the keywords rank.

Kuno received more than 100 visitors in the last few months, which converted at 2.5% for the phrase Facebook Like. Our website doesn’t even rank in the top 100 for that phrase. Now imagine the traffic impact of having 14,000 phrases like that driving traffic to a website. Google’s search personalization, search plus your world, SSL encryption, geographic factors and others have rendered ranking a moot point.

Traditional SEO is Dead

The truth many SEOs don’t want to admit

If where a website ranks no longer matters, what are SEOs supposed to do? If they want to maximize how many keyword phrases drive traffic, they need to create lots of content, publish it frequently and distribute it across social media channels. Do companies really need to hire an SEO for that? A journalist is probably much better equipped for that than an SEO.

Some might argue that you still need keyword research and on-page sculpting, but any journalist with half a brain can download an SEO cheat sheet and spend a few hours on Google’s keyword tool. Other's may want to talk about the need for link building. If a webmaster is publishing good content two to three times per day, distributing it via social media and engaging in PR tactics, the link building naturally takes care of itself.


Number of Organic Keyword Phrases


Yes, this is a simplification of the process, but there’s still truth in it. Ideally, an enterprise level company would want to hire an existing SEO, inbound marketing or internet marketing company that’s equipped to create content daily, distribute it and engage via social media while deploying ongoing PR. However, for smaller companies that don’t dwell in competitive search environments like pills, porn or poker, hiring writers will deliver far better organic search engine traffic for the money.


Organic Traffic


It is for this reason and this reason only that the term SEO is in trouble. It doesn’t really matter what replaces it, but when companies start to figure out they can solve all of their search engine woes by simply creating a lot of good content on a regular basis and distributing it via social media, the term’s days will be numbered. To learn how Kuno grew organic search engine leads 633% focusing on how many keyword phrases drove traffic and not where they rank, watch this SEO video.



Pie Chart: MarketingTechBlog.com




Inbound Marketing is the New SEO

Inbound Marketing IS the New SEO

Learn how Kuno Creative increased leads from organic search by 633%. This video contains seven actionable SEO takeaways you can use today.

Watch Now

Comments

Incredible post, Chad! Blew me away. Thanks for a very well-reasoned and thoughtful retrospective of the changes blasting through our industry. This makes it easy to understand how Kuno has achieved their standing in our industry. Hats off to you and the Kuno team for authentic thought leadership.
Posted @ Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:56 AM by Greg Linnemanstons
Never going to usher away the term SEO if you continue to use it in anchor text describing the new SEO... ;)  
 
Very good post.
Posted @ Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:10 AM by clevcfh
Great post. Your insights into the new organic search landscape are spot on. The debate over how to characterize SEO in our post-Panda era is a classic example of form over substance. As Internet search engines continuously evolve to pattern human-type higher level thinking, they need organic content that "feeds" their knowledge base and allows them to better respond to queries. If Google's goal (as stated) is to create AI, the need for human "communicators" with writing chops will only increase, while the need for SEO technocrats will further diminish. Ironic as it seems, the Internet, after all, is fundamentally a tool for human communication.
Posted @ Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:32 AM by Chris Horton
Greg: 
 
Wow - your reaction has left me speechless. Thank you so much for the kudos. It's not easy trying to stay cutting edge and forward of the curve, but comments like that make it seem like we are getting there :) 
 
Clevcfc: 
 
Touche! Yes you are quite accurate. I'll just add that it's mainly industry folks talking about this stuff for now. As a result, I am still forced to include the term "SEO" in the usual on-page sculpting places to increase the chances of reaching those who aren't industry insiders. What can I say? I came up as a classic old school SEO. :) 
 
Chris: 
 
Thanks for chiming in. Your points are definitely important to this convo. You and I definitely see eye to eye. 
 
@CPollittIU
Posted @ Thursday, February 16, 2012 9:31 PM by Chad H. Pollitt
If i'm reading into what your saying in the few posts I've read, (really only had about 5 minutes and planned to read first one i happened to find quickly and have now been reading for about an hour and read 5 or 6, needless to say, I really find your content fantastic and everything you have mentioned that i've read makes perfect sense and you have the reasoning and explanations to back it up which is a rarity with many of the ppl out there i've found. Anyways, so I have a business selling signed sports memorabilia and have started a few blogs and social media accounts trying to "spread the word" per se. So with my blogs, it would make the most sense as of now to write short quality posts a few times a day over the most expansive single post once each day or every other day?  
 
Posted @ Sunday, February 19, 2012 8:38 PM by joshua hastings
Joshua: 
 
Appreciate the 'tip of the hat' and hope your hour long excursion into my writings weren't too painful ;) 
 
Here are two things I'd do if I were in your shoes: 
 
First I'd identify the top 10 blogs about sports memorabilia and take an inventory of all of their attributes (post frequency, average length, the popular topics, etc.). That industry tends to be very competitive online so knowing who the best are will provide you the best road map moving forward.  
 
Second, I'd work on trying to publish everyday if possible. If that means publishing a short (250 - 400 words) quality post than so be it. Remember that the content needs to solve a problem or be entertaining. 
 
Hope that helps. 
 
@CPollittIU
Posted @ Monday, February 20, 2012 8:56 AM by Chad H. Pollitt
Comments have been closed for this article.