Subscribe by Email

Your email:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Youtube Google+ Inbound Marketing Blog

Inbound Marketing Agency Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Is Brand Still Relevant in Your Inbound Marketing Strategy?

 

Let's face it, the almighty brand is not what it used to be. Household brands like Toyota, BP, Tiger Woods and every bank you care to name have taken an absolute beating in recent years. Consumer revolt is only 140 characters away for any brand, and there is no place to hide. Advertisers and marketers are scratching their heads wondering what happened. Why are we so apparently anti-brand these days? Here are a few clues.

Value is King and Price is Queen

is brand still relevant in inbound marketingI could throw out a bunch of statistics, but consider your own buying behavior:

  • At the grocery store or pharmacy, which do you choose, brand name or generic?
  • Which is more important in your choice of restaurants, name or flavor (and price)?
  • When you buy a car, do you just go for the old family favorite or do you comparison shop?
  • When you buy anything, which is more important, brand name or ratings and reviews from current owners?

Yes, there are plenty of exceptions. Some brands just dominate their markets, like Walmart for example, but there are other choices. We have become educated consumers. We research before we buy and we seek referrals by both friends and perfect strangers in social networks. We do our homework and seek the best value.

Do you still do a lot of impulse buying? I can't remember the last product or service I bought without considering its value first.

What about the B2B space?

I think brand is even less relevant in B2B. We have always sought multiple options in business products and services, and the best value nearly always wins. Why? Because we are accountable to our stakeholders for our purchases, and there is no room for waste. Our buying decisions need to be spot-on, and brand name is only a minor factor compared to "fit" and cost-effectiveness.

Brand identity is still somewhat important. After all, you can have the best inbound marketing program in the world, but if people don't remember who you are, what's the point? My point is, make them remember your name by the value that you offer, not by the brand itself.

What about brand reputation and positioning?

I think these are incorrectly attributed to brand. Reputation is based on the relationships we (people) build with customers. This has little to do with brand these days. We position ourselves in the marketplace by the unique value proposition we bring to the party, not by our brand name. Note that it's not called "unique brand proposition". Value and perceived trustworthiness (of our people) is everything in competition.

What do you think?

As marketers, are we still pushing the almighty brand? Shouldn't we be focusing on communicating the value of our clients' offerings.

Photo credit: bunnicula


Comments

Interesting (and somewhat controversial) post.  
 
I think brand is still important in both b2b and b2c. It certainly helps influence the effectiveness of marketing and efficiency of sales.  
 
However, I think the old way of building a brand is dead. A strong brand is now a byproduct of strong inbound, content-based marketing, a good consultative sales process that facilitates buying and a really strong product and/or service. You can't buy brand awareness like they did back in the day. You can't sustain a strong brand unless you have your act together.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:28 AM by Peter Caputa
@Pete - yep, I agree with all of your points. We run into quite a few companies who get it backwards, focusing on their internal view of their brand, as if that sells itself. We have to show them that time after time it's what they say and do online that sells, not the logo, tagline and color scheme.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:52 PM by John McTigue
Brand still stands for whatever people think/feel/believe when they encounter your brand. It's a collection of expectations based on everything they've experienced prior to now. Just because people have more ability to comparison shop doesn't mean brand isn't critically important. Brand is why Toyota and Honda still have higher actual selling price than Hyundai, even though the physical product might be objectively more valuable. 
 
Expressing the brand is just exponentially more complicated today, requiring more attention to the authenticity of the brand promise than ever before. Just ask Google what they think about the value of their brand – or the value of the Hubspot brand. I'm sure they would have very passionate, positive views of both.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 11, 2011 6:18 PM by Greg Linnemanstons
@Greg - Well, you can call it whatever you want, but to me you're talking about value when you compare car manufacturers. People still perceive Toyota cars to be a better value in spite of the screw-ups in safety etc. I don't think it matters what Google or HubSpot think about their brands - what matters is what their customers and potential customers think. Both provide a great product and, in the case of HubSpot, great customer service. These are things that resonate with buyers. I'm not saying brand is dead (as @Pete said), I'm saying it's not the driver behind purchase anymore, so marketing shouldn't focus on it.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 11, 2011 6:40 PM by John McTigue
when does the importance of the perception of a good or service become irrelevant? moreover, when would the participation in building that perception be irrelevant? "brand" and "branding" is more important today as it has ever been—perhaps even more so.  
 
An entity name and its collective "brand" are not interchangeable synonyms. You implored marketers to "make [them] remember your name by the value that you offer, not by the brand itself." That remembrance—that memory—and how it culminates with other instances audiences experience goods or services (in whatever channel) IS the "brand" and IS how they will remember you. 
 
by successfully focusing on value delivery, an "almighty brand" is inherently built.  
Posted @ Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:52 PM by Ryan Wynia
@Ryan - you make some important points, but I think you're missing mine. You and I are marketers, so yes we are consumed with building brand for our clients. My question is, does that really matter to consumers so much anymore? I don't think so. I don't think people trust brands, at least not as much as they used to, but they do trust the knowledge they gather online or from friends about your products and services. It's a bit like being an investor - your due diligence determines whether or not you invest. This is what's happening in markets everywhere now. That mystical, "sticky" brand concept is fading. If my choice of "brand" suddenly starts to disappoint me, I'm far more likely to jump ship and run to an alternative than I ever have been.
Posted @ Thursday, May 12, 2011 7:01 AM by John McTigue
i think some of what may APPEAR to be controversial here is actually just semantic. i don't think that many people who advocate for strong b2b brands are talking about brand in the same way as the term is used in the b2c world. b2b brands are contructs in the minds of the consumer, but they are generated (purposefully or not) by the organization. a trusted, authentic brand is an element of reputation, but reputation is also impacted by the level of awareness as well as product performance, etc. it's possible to talk qualitatively about a brand that currently enjoys very little awareness - i think you're underestimating the power of goodwill created by an authentic, transparent brand strategy.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:20 PM by Erin Estep
@Erin - I would agree with you completely, except that we do have a lot of b2b clients that are in love with their own brand and put all of their marketing eggs in that basket. In most cases, they are the only ones who love their brand, so it's a case of improper priorities. If they would spend less time worrying about how the company is conveyed in website and other marketing materials and more time focusing on customer needs, they would likely see a big increase in sales leads and customer retention - both of which also improve brand reputation and awareness.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:29 PM by John McTigue
agreed. b2b marketing groups start slipping into the danger zone when they cling to the belief that their brand is what they want it to be - putty in their hands - rather than having a life of its own in the minds of their customers. i have conversations with clients about this all the time. brands contain subjective elements, but ultimately they exist in objective reality. it's sort of like: 
 
chocolate is good! (subjective, opinion) 
i like chocolate! (objective, fact) 
 
i think that is an important nuance that tends to get lost in the shuffle and clutter of logos, color palettes, collateral materials and bullhorn-style twitter accounts. in fact, i think i'll write my next blog post on that exact topic, come to think of it. great, thought-provoking post!
Posted @ Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:34 PM by Erin Estep
@Erin - yes! I get excited about a b2b brand when I see some compelling stats, a really good thorough review, or a write-up in a journal. Those may be subjective, but they have the voice of an authentic 3rd party source. Much more valuable than simply talking up your own capabilities - "we're the industry leader..." which carries zero credibility. Looking forward to your post on the subject. Please connect with me on LinkedIn (linkedin.com/jmctigue) and keep me updated. Best.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 25, 2011 3:54 PM by John McTigue
Comments have been closed for this article.